Connect with us

News

Tech industry group sues to block California law designed to protect kids online over free speech concerns

NetChoice, a tech industry group that include amazonand Twitter, Wednesday that it’s suing California to block the state’s new Age-Appropriate Design Code Act, which it says violates the First Amendment.

Modeled off standards in the U.K., the california aims to establish rules that make the internet safer for kids. It requires the highest privacy settings to be turned on by default for minors and says that online services targeting kids under 18 must assess the risk of harm to those users that could come from potentially harmful messages or exploitation.

The  adds to a growing slate of court cases involving free expression on the internet. Lawmakers are, in many instances, attempting to weaken the that online platforms enjoy for their content moderation efforts and their users’ posts.

Concern over privacy and moderation issues extends across party lines, though Republicans and Democrats still largely disagree on how they should be handled. While the California bill was passed by a majority Democratic legislature, NetChoice has also sued both Texas and Florida over their social media laws passed by majority Republican legislatures. Those bills seek to hold tech platforms accountable for taking down posts on the basis of political views.

In California, NetChoice alleges the new law will harm minors, rather than protecting them, while also infringing on First Amendment rights to free speech by forcing companies to guess the meaning of “inherently subjective terms” from users.

“The State is empowered to impose crushing financial penalties” if the companies guess incorrectly, the group said. “The State can also impose such penalties if companies fail to enforce their content moderation standards to the Attorney General’s satisfaction.”

NetChoice says the law, which is set to take effect in July 2024, will produce “overwhelming pressure to over-moderate content to avoid the law’s penalties for content the State deems harmful.” The “over-moderation,” the group says will “stifle important resources, particularly for vulnerable youth who rely on the Internet for life-saving information.”

A representative for California Attorney General Rob Bonta’s office defended the law in an emailed statement.

The measure “provides critical new protections over the collection and use of their data and works to address some of the real and demonstrated harms associated with social media and other online products and services,” the statement said. “We are reviewing the complaint and look forward to defending this important children’s safety law in court.”

 

Continue Reading

Copyright © 2022 California Reader

slot777 slot thailand slot777 https://situsterpercayaslot777.com/ slot gacor hari ini slot gacor maxwin slot deposit pulsa slot deposit pulsa tri http://sia.unidha.ac.id/repository/dosen/riwayat/login/dewajasin/ https://karanganyar.alabidin.sch.id/wp-content/shop/ https://smpabbs.alabidin.sch.id/dewajasin/ https://thehero.alabidin.sch.id/merdeka/ https://abbs.alabidin.sch.id/angkorwd/ https://gemoy99.com/jutsu/ https://alabidin.sch.id/katon/ https://platinum.alabidin.sch.id/gold/ https://stia.alabidin.sch.id/bavet/
slot777 slot gacor slot777 slot777 slot gacor hari ini slot gacor maxwin slot deposit pulsa slot deposit pulsa tri https://pofigold.com/ https://gemoy99.com/ macan99 macan99 macan99 macan99 macan99 https://gemoy99.com/jutsu/?slot=hakim+4d http://kpud-madiunkab.go.id/wp-content/uploads/gold/ https://toindo.com.br/cmsb2022/propos/